ارائه رویکرد ترکیبی SWARA-COPRAS به منظور رتبه‌بندی گزینه‌های مدیریتی کاهش نفوذ آب شور در آبخوان‌های ساحلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد آب و سازه های هیدرولیکی، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه صنعتی نوشیروانی بابل، بابل، ایران.

2 استادیار پژوهشی، مؤسسه تحقیقات آب، وزارت نیرو، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه آب و سازه های هیدرولیکی، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه صنعتی نوشیروانی بابل، بابل، ایران.

چکیده

یکی از مسائل و مشکلات در آبخوان‌های ساحلی نفوذ آب از طرف دریا به آبخوان است. لذا شناخت جامع و مدیریت منابع آب زیرزمینی در اینگونه آبخوان‌ها جهت توسعه پایدار بسیار حائز اهمیت است. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائة چارچوبی جهت رتبه‌بندی گزینه‌های مدیریتی و انتخاب گزینه برتر برای کنترل نفوذ آب شور در آبخوان ساحلی تجن تهیه شده است. در ابتدا معیارهای درنظرگرفته شده شامل معیارهای فنی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی با استفاده از روش SWARA وزندهی و اهمیت آن‌ها مشخص شد. نتایج روش نشان SWARA داد که معیار زیست‌محیطی با وزن 28/0 اهمیت بیشتری نسبت به سایر معیارها دارد. در ادامه از روش COPRAS برای رتبه‌بندی و انتخاب گزینه برتر مدیریتی استفاده شد. براساس نتایج حاصل از روش COPRAS، گزینه‌های کاهش پنج درصدی پمپاژ، کاهش 10 درصدی پمپاژ و تغذیه مصنوعی در رتبه‌های اول تا سوم قرار گرفتند. جهت ارزیابی اثر گزینه برتر بر نحوه حرکت شوری با استفاده از مدل SEAWAT، ابتدا تغییرات تراز آب زیرزمینی و غلظت شوری به ترتیب با مدل‌های MODFLOW و MT3DMS شبیه‌سازی شد. نتایج حاصل از اجرای سناریوی برتر با استفاده از مدل SEAWAT نشان‌دهنده کاهش حرکت گوه شوری بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A hybrid approach with SWARA and COPRAS methods in ranking management strategies to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mina Nasiri 1
  • Hamid Kardan moghaddam 2
  • Mehdi Hamidi 3
1 Former M.Sc. Student in Water and Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran.
2 Research Assistant Professor, Department of Water resources research, Water research institute, Ministry of energy, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Water and Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran.
چکیده [English]

One of the problems in coastal aquifers is seawater intrusion into fresh-water aquifers. Therefore, comprehensive knowledge and management of groundwater resources in such aquifers is very important for sustainable development. In this regard, the present study has been prepared with the aim of providing a framework for ranking management alternatives and selecting the best alternative for controlling the seawater intrusion in the Tajan coastal aquifer. Initially, the considered criteria including technical, economic, social and environmental criteria were weighted using SWARA method and their importance was determined. The results of SWARA method showed that the environmental criterion with a weight of 0.28 is more important than other criteria. Then, The COPRAS method was used to rank and select the top management alternatives. Based on the results of the COPRAS method, the alternatives of 5% reduction in pumping, 10% reduction in pumping and artificial recharge were ranked first to third. To evaluate the effect of the best alternative on salinity movement using SEAWAT model, first groundwater level changes and salinity concentration were simulated with MODFLOW and MT3DMS models, respectively. The results of the implementation of the best alternative using the SEAWAT model showed a decrease in salinity wedge movement.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Groundwater modeling
  • MCDM
  • Seawater intrusion
  • SWARA-COPRAS

مراجع

  1. Abd-Elhamid, H. F., & Javadi, A. A. (2011). A cost-effective method to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resources Management, 25(11), 2755-2780.‏
  2. Abdoulhalik, A., Ahmed, A., & Hamill, G. A. (2017). A new physical barrier system for seawater intrusion control. Journal of Hydrology, 549, 416-427.‏
  3. Bruington, A. E. (1972). Saltwater intrusion into aquifers 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 8(1), 150-160.‏
  4. Essink, G. H. O. (2001). Improving fresh groundwater supply- problems and solutions. Ocean & Coastal Management, 44(5-6), 429-449.
  5. Faraji Sabokbar, H., Rezvani, M., Behnam Morshedi, H., & Rousta, H. (2014). Spatial classifying of tourism routes in Fars province on tourism services and facilities. Human Geography Research, 46(3), 561-586. (In Persian).
  6. García-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2012). On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56(5-6), 123-132.‏
  7. Ghenai, C., Albawab, M., & Bettayeb, M. (2020). Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renewable Energy, 146, 580-597.‏
  8. Hamidi, M., & Sabbagh-Yazdi, S. R. (2008). Modeling of 2D density-dependent flow and transport in porous media using finite volume method. Computers & fluids, 37(8), 1047-1055.‏
  9. Han, Z. (2003). Groundwater resources protection and aquifer recovery in China. Environmental Geology, 44(1), 106-111.‏
  10. Hussain, M. S., Javadi, A. A., & Sherif, M. M. (2015). Three dimensional simulation of seawater intrusion in a regional coastal aquifer in UAE. Procedia Engineering, 119, 1153-1160.‏
  11. Jafari, F., & Eftekhari, M. (2013). Assessment of urmia lake water interactions and saltwater intrusion to surrounding aquifers. Water and Irrigation Management, 3(1), 29-47. (In Persian).
  12. Jalut, Q. H., Abbas, N. L., & Mohammad, A. T. (2018). Management of groundwater resources in the al-mansourieh zone in the diyala river basin in eastern Iraq. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 6, 79-86.‏
  13. Javadi, A., Hussain, M., Sherif, M., & Farmani, R. (2015). Multi-objective optimization of different management scenarios to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resources Management, 29(6), 1843-1857.‏
  14. Kardan moghaddam, H., Banihabib, M. &, Javadi, S. (2017a). Assessment of artificial recharge on aquifer restoring using sustainability index. Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 4(4), 1241-1253. (In Persian).
  15. Kardan moghaddam, H., Jafari, F. & Javadi, S. (2017b). Vulnerability evaluation of a coastal aquifer via GALDIT model and comparison with DRASTIC index using quality parameters. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62(1), 137-146.
  16. Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243-258.‏
  17. Kourakos, G., & Mantoglou, A. (2006). Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers using 3-d density models and approximations with neural networks. In: Proceedings of XVI International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, 18-22 June, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1-8.
  18. Lahr, J. H. (1982). Artificial ground‐water recharge: A solution to many us water‐supply problems. Groundwater, 20(3), 262-266.
  19. Lashkarian Nabipay, S., & Davoudi, M. H. (2008). Groundwater dams a way to optimize the management of groundwater resources in watersheds. In: Proceeding of 4th National Conference on Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering of Iran, 19-20 February, University of Tehran, Faculty of Natural Resources, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian).
  1. Luyun Jr, R., Momii, K., & Nakagawa, K. (2009). Laboratory-scale saltwater behavior due to subsurface cutoff wall. Journal of Hydrology, 377(3-4), 227-236.‏
  2. Naderi, M. H. (2010). Evaluation of seawater intrusion control methods in coastal/desert. In: Proceeding of1stNational Conference Coastal Lands, on Water Resources Management, 8 December, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran. (In Persian).
  3. Nasiri, M., Hamidi, M., Kardan moghaddam, H. (2020a). Evaluating the effect of supplying drinking water and agriculture water of Sari-Neka aquifer on the salinity movement with the utilization of Gelvard dam, Journal of Soil and Water Resources Conservation, 9(2), 71-88. (In Persian).
  4. Nasiri, M., Hamidi, M., & Kardan moghaddam, H. (2020b). Simulation of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers (case study: the southern shores of the Caspian sea). Journal of Water and Soil, 34(2), 269-286. (In Persian).
  5. Oz, I., Shalev, E., Yechieli, Y., & Gvirtzman, H. (2015). Saltwater circulation patterns within the freshwater–saltwater interface in coastal aquifers: Laboratory experiments and numerical modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 530, 734-741.‏
  6. Shammi, M., Rahman, M., Bondad, S. E., & Bodrud-Doza, M. (2019). Impacts of salinity intrusion in community health: a review of experiences on drinking water sodium from coastal areas of Bangladesh. In Healthcare, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 7(1), 50.
  7. Telmer, K., & Best, M. (2004). Underground dams: a practical solution for the water needs of small communities in semi-arid regions. Scientific Communication, TERRÆ, 1(1), 63-65.
  8. Todd, D. K. (1959).Ground water hydrology. New York, John Wiley & Sons.‏
  9. Tully, K., Gedan, K., Epanchin-Niell, R., Strong, A., Bernhardt, E. S., BenDor, T., & Weston, N. B. (2019). The invisible flood: The chemistry, ecology, and social implications of coastal saltwater intrusion. BioScience, 69(5), 368-378.‏
  10. Van Dam, J. C. (1999). Exploitation, restoration and management. Seawater intrusion in coastal Aquifers Concepts, Methods and Practices. Dordrecht, Springer.
  11. Vengadesan, M., & Lakshmanan, E. (2019). Management of coastal groundwater resources. Coastal Management. Academic Press.‏ 383-397.
  12. White, E., & Kaplan, D. (2017). Restore or retreat saltwater intrusion and water management in coastal wetlands. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 3(1), e01258.‏
  13. Zavadskas, E. K., & Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an efficient contractor byusing the new method of multicriteria assessment. In: Langford, D. A.; Retic, A. (Eds.), In: Proceeding of International symposium for the organisation and management ofconstruction. Shaping theory and practice. Managing the construction project and managing risk, CIB W 65, London, 2, 94-104.
  14. Zavadskas, E. K., Stević, Ž., Tanackov, I., & Prentkovskis, O. (2018). A novel multicriteria approach–rough step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis method (R-SWARA) and its application in logistics. Studies in Informatics and Control, 27(1), 97-106.‏
مدیریت آب و آبیاری
دوره 10، شماره 3
دی 1399
صفحه 365-379

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار