بررسی عملکرد گوجه‌فرنگی تحت تأثیر کم‌آبیاری تنظیم شده و آبیاری ناقص ریشه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 هیئت علمی، گروه کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور

2 مدس گروه کشاورزی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی اثر کم‌آبیاری بر عملکرد گوجه‌فرنگی، آزمایشی در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با سه تکرار در شهرستان جیرفت اجرا شد. در این تحقیق پنج تیمار شامل آبیاری کامل، کم‌آبیاری تنظیم شده و آبیاری ناقص ریشه در دو سطح 75 و 55 درصد مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که اعمال کم‌آبیاری سبب 16 تا 34 درصد صرفه‌جویی در میزان آب مصرفی شد. بیشترین عملکرد محصول (65/202 تن در هکتار) در تیمار آبیاری کامل بدست آمد. عملکرد و وزن میوه در سطح 75 درصد اعمال شده در آبیاری ناقص ریشه به‌ترتیب 95/195 تن در هکتار و 7/169 گرم بدست آمد. همچنین بیشترین کارایی مصرف آب با میانگین 6/45 کیلوگرم بر مترمکعب، مربوط به سطح 75 درصد اعمال شده در آبیاری ناقص ریشه بود. همچنین عملکرد سطح 75 درصد اعمال شده در کم‌آبیاری تنظیم شده به‌رغم مصرف آب یکسان با آبیاری ناقص ریشه در همان سطح، 1/16 درصد کاهش یافت. لذا سطح 75 درصد اعمال شده در آبیاری ناقص ریشه ضمن ممانعت از کاهش معنی‌دار عملکرد و صرفه‌جویی 25 درصدی آب، افزایش 14 درصدی کارایی مصرف آب را به‌همراه داشت که می‌تواند روشی مطمئن برای کنترل مصرف آب و افزایش بازده آبیاری در کشت گوجه‌فرنگی باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of yield of tomatoes under regulated deficit irrigation and partial root zone drying

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Mehrabi Gohari 1
  • rasoul Asadi 2
1 Academic member, Faculty of agriculture, payam noor university
2 Lectruer of Payame Noor University, Departement of Agricultural, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

In order to study the effects of deficit irrigation on yield of tomato, an experiment was conducted in Jiroft. The experiment treatments were arranged as randomized complete block design with three replications. The irrigation regimes consisted of full irrigation, regulated deficit and partial root zone drying irrigation (RDI75, RDI55). The results showed that deficit irrigation resulted in water saving at the rates of 16-34 percent. The highest yield (202.65 ton/ha) was produced by full irrigation. There was no significant difference between yield and fruit weight of full irrigation treatment and 75 percent water replacement in partial root zone drying. The highest water use efficiency was 45.6 kg/m3 was obtained in 75 percent water replacement in partial root zone drying. Also, despite the same water consumption of 75 percent water replacement in partial root zone drying and regulated deficit, yield was decrease 16.1 percent. Therefore, it can be concluded that 75 percent water replacement in partial root zone drying, which resulted in a non-significant decrease of yield and while resulting in a 25 percent decrease in water use and increased 14 percent of water use efficiency, would be a promising water-saving method as in Jiroft.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Drip Irrigation
  • Drought stress
  • Jirof
  • Water use efficiency
  • Yield components

مراجع

  1. Agricultural Statistics of Iran (2016). 1th edition. Ministry of agriculture, department of planning and economic development, Central information and communication technology, Tehran, Iran, pp 174.
  2. Ahmadi SH, Andersen MN, Plauborg F, Poulsen RT, Jensen CR, Sepaskhah AR and Hansen S (2010) Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: Gas exchange and xylem [ABA]. Agricultural Water Management. 97: 1486-1494.
  3. Allen RG, Pereir LS, Raes D and Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration guide lines for computing crop water requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome, Italy. p.300.
  4. Andersen MN, Shahnazari A, Jensen CR, Liu and F, Jacobsen SE (2006) Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Research. 100: 117-124.
  5. Asadi R, Kouhi N and Yazdanpanah N (2012) Applicability of micro irrigation system on cotton yield and water use efficiency. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 10: 302-306.
  6. Bray E.A (1997) Plant response to water deficit trends. Plant Science. 2: 48-54.
  7. Consoli S, Stango F, Vanella D, Boaga J, Cassiani G and Roccuzzo G (2017) Partial root-zone drying irrigation in orange orchards: Effects on water use and crop production characteristics. European Journal of Agronomy. 82: 190-202.
  8. Davies WJ, Bacon MA, Thompson DS, Sobeih W and Rodriguez LG (2000) Regulation of leaf and fruit growth in plants growing in drying soil: Exploitation of the plant’s chemical signaling system and hydraulic architecture to increase the efficiency of water use in agriculture. Experimental botany. 51:1617-1626.
  9. Dry PR and Loveys BR (1998) Factors influencing grapevine vigor and the potential for control with partial root zone drying. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 4: 140-148.
  10. Du S, Kang S, Li F and Du T (2017) Water use efficiency is improved by alternate partial root-zone irrigation of apple in arid northwest China. Agricultural Water Management. 179: 184-192.
  11. Ehret DL and Ho LC (1986) The effect of salinity on dry matter partitioning and fruit growth in tomato grown in nutrient film culture. Horticultural Science, 61: 367-383.
  12. Gheysari M, Mirlatif SM, Homaee M, Asadi ME and Hoogenboom G (2009) Nitrate leaching in a silage maize field under different irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer rates. Agricultural Water Management 96 (6): 946-954.
  13. Ghrab M, Gargouri K, Bentaher H, Chartzoulakisc K, Ayadia M, Mimound MB, Masmoudid MM, Mechliad NB and Psarrasc G (2013) Water relations and yield of olive tree (cv. Chemlali) in response to partial root-zone drying (PRD) irrigation technique and salinity under arid climate. Agricultural Water Management. 123: 1– 11.
  14. Haghighat Jou P, Asadi R and Mohammadrezakhani MR (2015) Determine water use efficiency to select the appropriate crop (Case study: Jirof region). Biosciences. 4 (6): 72–79.
  15. Haghighi M. (2010) The Effect of Partial Root Zone Drying on Water Relations, Growth, Yield and Some Qualitative Attributes of Tomato. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture. 2: 9-17
  16. Jureková Z, Németh-Molnár K and Paganová V (2011) Physiological responses of six tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars to water stress. Horticulture and Forestry. 3(10): 294-300.
  17. Kang S and Zhang J. (2004) Controlled alternate partial root- Zone irrigation: its physiological consequences and impact on water use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany. 55: 2437–2446.
  18. Karandish F (2016) Improved soil-plant water dynamics and economic water use efficiency in a maize field under locally water stress. Agronomy and Soil Science. 62 (9): 1311-1323.
  19. Limaa RSN, Assis Figueiredoa FAMM, Martinsa AO, Deusa BCS, Ferraza TM, Assis Gomesa MM, Sousab EF, Glennc DM and Campostrini E (2015) Partial rootzone drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) effects on stomatal conductance, growth, photosynthetic capacity and water-use efficiency of papaya. Scientia Horticulture. 183: 13–22.
  20.  Marjanović M, Jovanović Z, Stikić R and Radović B (2015) The Effect of partial root-zone drying on tomato fruit growth. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 29: 87-98.
  21. MetinSizen S, Gülendam C, Attila Y, Servet T and Burcak K (2010) Effect of irrigation management on yield and quality of tomatoes grown in different soilless media in a glasshouse. Scientific Research and Essay. 5 (1): 041-048.
  22. Mohammadkhani A, Nouri Emamzadehi M  and Mirjalili A. (2014) Effect of Partial Root Zone Drying Irrigation Method on Water Use Efficiency, Yield and Yield Components of Tomato. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 66:173-183.
  23. Nuruddin MM, Madramootoo CA and Dodds GT (2003) Effects of water stress at different growth stages on greenhouse tomato yield and quality. Horticulture science. 38: 1389-1393.
  24. Parvizi H, Sepaskhah AR and Ahmadi SH (2014) Effect of drip irrigation and fertilizer regimes on fruit yields and water productivity of a pomegranate (Punica granatum (L.) cv. Rabab) orchard. Agricultural Water Management. 146, 45–56.
  25. Phene CJ, Cormick RL, Miyamoto JM, Meek DW and Davis KR (2008) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of trickle irrigated tomatoes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Drip/Trickle Irrigation Congress, Fresno, CA. November, ASAE Publication. 10 (2): 823-831.
  26. Ponie S, Tagliavini M, Neri D, Scudellari D and Toselli M. (1992) Influence of root pruning and water stress on growth and physiological factors of potted apple, grape, peach and pear trees. Sciatica Horticulture. 52: 223–226.
  27. Qadir M (2003) Agricultural water management in water starved countries: Challenges and opportunities. Agricultural Water Management. 62: 165-185.
  28. Romero P, Gil Munoza R, Fernández-Fernández, I, Del Amorb F, Martínez-Cutillasa A and García-García J (2015). Improvement of yield and grape and wine composition in field-grown monastrell grapevines by partial root zone irrigation, in comparison with regulated deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 149: 55–73.
  29. Saeed H, Grove IG, Kettlewell PS and Hall NW (2008.) Potential of partial root zone drying as an alternative irrigation technique for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Annals of Applied Botany. 152: 71-80.
  30. Sarker KK, Akanda MA, Biswas SH, Roy DK, Khatun A and Goftar MA (2016) Field performance of alternate wetting and drying furrow irrigation on tomato crop growth, yield, water use efficiency, quality and profitability. Integrative Agriculture. 15(10): 2380–2392.
  31. Sepaskhah AR and Ahmadi SH (2010) A review on partial root-zone drying irrigation. Plant Production. 4 (4): 241-258.
  32. Shahnazari A, Liu F, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE and Jensen CR (2007) Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Research. 100: 117-124.
  33. Spreer W, Nagle M, Neidhart S, Carle R, Ongprasert S and Muller J (2007) Effect of regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying on the quality of mango fruits. Agricultural Water Management. 88: 173–180.
  34. Sun Y, Holm PE and Liu F (2014) Alternate partial root-zone drying irrigation improves fruit quality in tomatoes. Horticultural Science. 41 (4): 185–191.
  35. Topak R, Acar B, Uyanoz R and Ceyhan E (2016) Performance of partial root-zone drip irrigation for sugar beet production in a semi-arid area. Agricultural Water Management. 176: 180-190.
  36. Wang D, Kang Y and Wan S (2007) Effect of soil matric potential on tomato yield and water use under drip irrigation condition. Agricultural Water Management. 87, 180-186.
  37. Wang Z, Liu F, Kang SH and Jensen CR (2012) Alternate partial root zone drying irrigation improves nitrogen nutrition in maize (Zea mays) leaves. Environmental Experimental Botany. 75: 36-40.
  38. Yazar A, Gökçel F and Sezen M (2009) Corn yield response to partial root zone drying and deficit irrigation strategies applied with drip system. Plant Soil Environment. 55: 494-503.
  39. Zheng J, Huang G, Jia D, wang J, Mota M, Pereira L, Huang Q, Xu X and Liu H (2013) Responses of drip irrigated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield,quality and water productivity to various soil matric potential thresholds in an arid region of Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management. 129: 181– 193.
مدیریت آب و آبیاری
دوره 7، شماره 2
مهر 1396
صفحه 257-272

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار