بررسی شاخص‌های بهره‌وری آب، غذا و انرژی با استفاده از چارچوب حسابداری آب WA+ و رویکرد پیوندی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده فناوری کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 مؤسسه تحقیقات آب، وزارت نیرو، تهران، ایران.

10.22059/jwim.2023.357988.1069

چکیده

این مطالعه با هدف افزایش بهره‌وری آب، غذا و انرژی اقدام به توسعه و اعتبارسنجی ابزاری برای ارزیابی استراتژی‌های مدیریتی کشاورزی در رابطه با پیوند امنیت آب، غذا و انرژی در دو مرحله انجام شد. در بخش اول با استفاده از چارچوب حسابداری آب WA+، با هدف آنالیز پارامترهای هیدروکلیماتولوژی اقدام به محاسبه کاربرگ‌های چهارگانه منابع پایه، تبخیر و تعرق، برداشت منابع آب و بهره‌وری حوضه آبریز پلاسجان و تعیین سناریوهای مدیریتی جهت افزایش بهره‌وری شد و در بخش دوم سناریوهای مدیریتی با رویکرد پیوندی موردارزیابی و اولویت‌بندی قرار گرفت. نتایج WA+ نشان داد که در حوضه پلاسجان حجم بالای تبخیروتعرق غیرمفید بود. در بخش دوم این پژوهش، بین چهار سناریوی اصلی (48 زیرسناریو) معرفی شده جهت بهبود بهره‌وری، سناریوهای تغییر رقم و تیمار آبیاری، تغییر سطح زیرکشت و کشت دیم با آبیاری تکمیلی دارای تأثیر مثبت در شاخص بهره‌وری آب، غذا و انرژی بودند. پس از اولویت‌بندی زیرسناریوهای تأثیرگذار با مدل تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیارهTOPSIS ، زیرسناریو رقم شش گندم با تیمار آبیاری کامل بیش‌ترین تأثیر مثبت در بهره‌وری آب، غذا و انرژی را داشته و به‌عنوان سناریو شاخص برای ارزیابی بهره‌وری در مدیریت کشاورزی شناسایی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment of Water, Food, and Energy Productivity Indices Using the WA+ Water Accounting Framework and a Nexus Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Ali Moasheri 1
  • saman Javadi 1
  • Mahmoud Mashal 1
  • hamid Kardan moghaddam 2
  • Behzad Azadegan 1
1 Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, University of Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, University of Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

With the aim of increasing water, food and energy productivity, this study was carried out in two stages to develop and validate a tool for evaluating agricultural management strategies in relation to the link between water, food and energy security (NEXUS). In the first part, using the WA+ water accounting framework, with the aim of analyzing the parameters of hydro climatology, the four worksheets of basic resources, evaporation and transpiration, harvesting of water resources and productivity of the Plasjan watershed were calculated and management scenarios were determined to increase productivity, and in the second part, management scenarios with The NEXUS approach were evaluated and prioritized. The results of WA+ showed that in the Plasjan basin, the high volume of evaporation and transpiration was useless. In the second part of this research, among the 4 main scenarios (48 sub-scenarios) introduced to improve productivity, the scenarios of cultivar change and irrigation treatment, change of cultivated area and rainfed cultivation with supplementary irrigation had a positive effect on water, food and energy productivity index. After prioritizing the influential sub-scenarios with the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making model, the sub-scenario of wheat variety 6 with full irrigation treatment had the most positive effect on water, food and energy productivity and was identified as an indicator scenario for evaluating productivity in agricultural management.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Groundwater
  • NEXUS
  • Plasjan plain
  • Water accounting

مراجع

  1. Agricultural Statistics. (2019). Agricultural Statistics Crop Year 2016-2017, Volume one: Crops Products, Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, Deputy of Planning and Economics, ICT Center. (In Persian)
  2. Agricultural Statistics. (2020). Agricultural Statistics Crop Year 2016-2017, Volume one: Crops Products, Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, Deputy of Planning and Economics, ICT Center. (In Persian)
  3. Acaroglu, M. (1998). Energy from biomass, and applications. University of Selcuk, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Turkey. 43 pp.
  4. Journal of Water Productivity and Improvement Methods. (2016). Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. (In Persian)
  5. Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision (No. 12-03, p. 4). Rome, FAO: ESA Working paper.
  6. (2010). FAO Aquastat China Country ProVle. fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/countries regions/Iran/index.stm. Rost, S., Gerten, D., Bondeau, A., Lucht, W., Rohwer, J., & Schaphoı, S. (2008). Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system. Water Resources Research, 44.
  7. Azizi, K., & Heidari, S. (2013). A comparative study on energy balance and economical indices in irrigated and dry land barley production systems. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10, 1019-1028.
  8. Beheshti Tabar, I., Keyhani, A., & Rafiee, S. (2010). Energy balance in Iran's agronomy (1990-2006). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 849-855.
  9. Bizikova, L., Roy, D., Henry, D., Venema, D., & McCandless, M. (2013). The Water–Energy–Food Security Nexus: Towards a practical planning and decision-support framework for landscape investment and risk management. The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Report. http://www.iisd.org/library/water-energyfood-security-nexus-towards-practical-planning-anddecision-support-framework. Accessed 04 Dec 2014.
  10. Cai, X., Molden, D., Mainuddin, M., Sharma, B., Ahmad, M., & Karimi, P. (2011). Producing more food with less water in a changing world: assessment of water productivity in 10 major river basins. Water International. 36, 42-62. doi:10.1080/02508060.2011.542403.
  11. Canakci, M., Topakci, M., Akinci, I., & Ozmerzi, A. (2005). Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 46, 655-666.
  12. Chalmers, K., Godfrey, J., & Potter, B. (2012). Discipline-Informed Approaches to Water Accounting. Australian Accounting Review, 22(3), 275-285.
  13. Chapagain, A. K., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The blue, green and grey water footprint of rice from production and consumption perspectives. Ecological Economics, 70(4), 749-758.
  14. Choudhury, I., & Bhattacharya, B. (2018). An assessment of satellite-based agricultural water productivity over the Indian region. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39, 2294-2311.
  15. Cook, S.E., Fisher, M.J., Andersson, M.S., Rubiano, J., & Giordano, M. (2009b). Water, food and livelihoods in river basins. Water International, 34, 13-29.
  16. Cosgrove, W.J., & Loucks, D.P. (2015). Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resour. Res, 66, 17.
  17. Dalin, C., Hanasaki, N., Qiu, H., Mauzerall, D. L., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2014). Water resources transfer through Chinese interprovincial and foreign food trade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(27), 9774-9779.
  18. De, D., Singh, R., & Chandra, H. (2001). Technological impact on energy consumption in rainfed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Applied Energy, 70, 193-213.
  19. D'Odorico, P., Carr, J., Laio, F., & Ridol, L. (2012). Spatial organization and drivers of the virtual water trade: a community-structure analysis. Environ. Res. Lett.
  20. Dublin Statement. (1992). The Dublin statement and report of the conference. International conference on water and the environment: development issues for the 21st century, 26-31 January 1992, Dublin, Ireland. Fom: http://www.un-documents.net/h2o­dub.htm.
  21. El-Gafy, I. (2017). Water–food–energy nexus index: analysis of water-energy-food nexus of crop's production system applying the indicators approach. Applied Water Science, 7, 2857-2868.
  22. El-Gafy, I. (2017). Water–food–energy nexus index: analysis of water–energy–food nexus of crop’s production system applying the indicators approach. Applied Water Science, 7, 2857-2868.
  23. Fliervoet, J. M., Geerling, G. W., Mostert, E., & Smits, A. J. M. (2016). Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands. Environmental Management, 57, 355-367.
  24. Ghasemi Mobtaker, H., Akram, A., & Keyhani, A. (2010). Investigation of energy consumption of perennial Alfalfa Production-Case study: Hamedan province. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 8, 379-381.
  25. Gleik, P. H. (2008). Can California's Water Problems Be Solved. Ecology L.Currents, 35, 71.
  26. Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S.M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812-818.
  27. Halbe, J., Pahl-Wostl, C., Lange, M.A., & Velonis, C. (2015). Governance of transitions towards sustainable development–the water–energy–food nexus in Cyprus. Water International, 40, (5-6), 877-894.
  28. Hanlon, P., Madel, R., Olson-Sawyer, K., Rabin, K., & Rose, J. (2013). Food, water and energy: know the nexus. GRACE Communications Foundation, Water and Energy Programs, New York.
  29. Hatirli, S.A., Ozkan, B., & Fert, C. (2006). Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 31, 427-438.
  30. Herrhz, J.L., Girth, V.S., & Cerisola, C. (1995). Long-term energy use and economic evaluation of three tillage systems for cereal and legume production in central Spain. Soil and Tillage Research, 35, 183-198.
  31. Hoekstra, A. Y., & Chapagain, A. K. (2007). Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resource Manage, 21, 35-48.
  32. Karimi, P., Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Molden, D., & Cheema, M. J. M. (2013): Basin-wide water accounting using remote sensing data: the case of transboundary Indus Basin, Hydro/. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2473-2486, doi: 10.5194/hess-17-2473-2013.
  33. Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., Yousefi, M., & Movahedi, M. (2013). Modeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks. Energy, 52, 333-338.
  34. Kijne, J.W., Barker, R., & Molden, D. (eds) (2003). Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 1. CAB International, Wallingford, UK in association with International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo.
  35. Kitani, O. (1999). CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, United States of America.
  36. Kivi, Z.R., Javadi, S., Karimi, N., Shahdany, S.M.H., & Moghaddam, H.K. (2022). Performance evaluation and verification of groundwater balance using WA+ as a new water accounting system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(8), 580.
  37. Klimes, M., Michel, D., Yaari, E., & Restiani, P. (2015). Water diplomacy: the intersect of science, policy and practice. Hydrol.
  38. Li, F., Lozier, M.S., Danabasoglu, G., Holliday, N.P., Kwon, Y.O., Romanou, A., Yeager, S.G., & Zhang, R. (2019). Local and downstream relationships between Labrador Sea Water volume and North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation variability. Clim., 32 (13), 3883-3898.
  39. Mandal, K., Saha, K., Ghosh, P., Hati, K., & Bandyopadhyay, K. (2002). Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybeanbased crop production systems in central India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 23, 337-345.
  40. McDonnell, R.A. (2008). Challenges for integrated water resources management: how do we provide the knowledge to support truly integrated thinking? J. Water Resour. Dev., 24, 131-143.
  41. Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Keyhani, A., Mousavi-Avval, S.H., & Nonhebel, S. (2014). Energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of farming systems in north Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 724-733.
  42. Mohammadzadeh, A., Damghani, A.M., Vafabakhsh, J., & Deihimfard, R. (2017). Assessing energy efficiencies, economy, and global warming potential (GWP) effects of major crop production systems in Iran: a case study in East Azerbaijan province. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 16971-16984.
  43. Mohammadzadeh, A., Mahdavi Damghani, A., Vafabakhsh, J., & Deihimfard, R. (2018). Ecological–economic efficiency for alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and corn silage (Zea mays L.) production systems: Maragheh– Bonab plain, east Azerbaijan province. Journal of Agroecology, 10, 875-895. (In Persian with English Summary).
  44. Molden, D. (1997). Accounting for water use and productivity. International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
  45. Molden, D., & Oweis, T.Y. (2007). Pathways for increasing agricultural water productivity. In Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, ed. D. Molden, 279-310. London: Earthscan and International Water Management Institute.
  46. Molden, D., Oweis, T., Steduto, P., Bindraban, P., Hanjra, M.A., & Kijne, J. (2010). Improving agricultural water productivity: between optimism and caution. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 528-535. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.023.
  47. Mondani, F., Khoramivafa, M., Aleagha, S., & Ghobadi, R. (2015). Assessment of energy flow in irrigated and dry-land wheat farms under different climatic conditions in Kermanshah province. Journal of Agroecology, 5, 75-88. (In Persian with English Summary).
  48. Mousavi-Avval, S.H., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2011a). Energy flow modeling and sensitivity analysis of inputs for canola production in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1464-1470.
  49. Mousavi-Avval, S.H., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2011b). Improving energy use efficiency of canola production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Energy, 36, 2765-2772.
  50. Nagy, C.N. (1999). Energy coefficients for agriculture inputs in western Canada. Canadian Agricultural Energy End-Use Data Analysis Centre (CAEEDAC). University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
  51. Pimentel, D. 1980. Handbook of energy utilization in agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  52. Rahimzadeh, Z., Javadi, S., Karimi, N., Hashemi Shahdani, S. M., & Kardan Moghadam, H. (2019). Using the WA+ Accounting Framework in Assessing Evapotranspiration and Water Productivity (Case Study: Plasjan Watershed). Journal of Water and Soil Research in Iran, 5(52), 2008-479X. (In Persian)
  53. Rahimzadeh, Z., Javadi, S., Karimi, N., Hashemi Shahdani, S. M., & Kardan Moghadam, H. (2020). The WA+ Water Accounting Approach in Analyzing Water Resources and Water Use Balance (Case Study: Plasjan Watershed). Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 12(1), 188-199. (In Persian)
  54. Rajabi, M.H., Soltani, A., Vahidnia, B., Zeinali, E., & Soltani, E. (2012). Evaluation of fuel consumption in wheat fields in Gorgan. Environmental Science, 9, 143-164.
  55. Ray, D.K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N.D., West, P.C., & Foley, J.A. (2013). Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLOS ONE, 8 (6), 1-8.
  56. Reichert, P., Langhans, S.D., Lienert, J., & Schuwirth, N. (2015). The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support. Environ. Manag., 154, 316-332,
  57. Rost, S., Gerten, D., Bondeau, A., Lucht, W., Rohwer, J., & Schaphoı, S. (2008). Agricultural green and blue water consumption and it’s in^uence on the global water system. Water Resources Research, 44.
  58. Sahabi, H., Feizi, H., & Amirmoradi, S. (2013). Which crop production system is more efficient in energy use: wheat or barley? Environment, development and sustainability, 15, 711-721.
  59. Sahabi, H., Feizi, H., & Karbasi, A. (2016). Is saffron more energy and economic efficient than wheat in crop rotation systems in northeast Iran? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 5, 29-35.
  60. Salam, P. A., Pandey, V. P., Shrestha, S., & Anal, A. K. (2017). The need for the nexus approach,” in Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Principles and Practices, eds P. Abdul Salam, S. Shrestha, V. Prasad Pandey, and A. K. Anal (Washington, DC: John Wiley and Sons, Inc), 1-10.
  61. Shafiei, M., Majidi, M., Jodoui, A., Salmaniha, S., & Pashtavan, H. (2019). An Introduction to the National Symposium on Unresolved Issues of Water Balance in the Country: The Necessity of Collaboration and Synergy in Addressing the Most Important Component of Iran's Water Resources Management. Water and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 83-86. (In Persian)
  62. Stein, C., Ernstson, H., & Barron, J. (2011). A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C, 36, 1085-1092.
  63. Stein, C., Barron, J., & Moss, T. (2014). Governance of the nexus:from buzz words to a strategic action perspective. Nexus Network Think Piece Series, Paper 003.
  64. Scheierling, S. M., Treguer, D. O., Booker, J. F., & Decker, E. (2014). How to assess agricultural water productivity? Looking for water in the agricultural productivity and efficiency literature.
  65. Seekell, D., D’Odorico, P., & Pace, M. (2011). Virtual water transfers unlikely to redress inequality in global water use. Environ Res Lett, 6, 455-468.
  66. Shroder, J.F., Eqrar, N., Waizy, H., Ahmadi, H., & Weihs, B.J. (2022). Review of the Geology of Afghanistan and its water resources. International Geology Review, 64(7), 1009-1031.
  67. Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., Stigson, B., Shrivastava, P., Leach, M., & O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Sustain. Sci., 12, 911-919.
  68. Tsatsarelis, C., & Koundouras, D. (1994). Energetics of baled alfalfa hay production in northern Greece. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 49, 123-130.
  69. Tsatsarelis, C., & Koundouras, D. (1994). Energetics of baled alfalfa hay production in northern Greece. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 49, 123-130.
  70. United Nations Statistics Division. (2012). System of environmental-economic accounting for water, UNSD Pub., N.Y.
  71. United Nations. (2008). System of National Accounts 2008. UN, New York.
  72. United Nations. (2013). World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ESA/P/WP.227. New York: United Nations.
  73. Vafabakhsh, J., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2019). Energy flow and GHG emissions in major field and horticultural crop production systems (Case study: Sharif Abad plain). Journal of Agroecology, 11(2), 365-382. (In Persian)
  74. Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., & Lammers, R. B. (2000). Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science‚ 289(5477), 284-288.
  75. World Bank. (2014). The World Bank Annual Report 2014. Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20093 License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO.
  76. WWAP, U.W.W.A. (2015). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for A Sustainable World. UNESCO Publishing (2015).
  77. Young, R.A. (2005). Determining the economic value of water, concepts and methods, Washington, resources for the future, Discussion paper, 101, 27-35.
  78. Yilmaz, I., Akcaoz, H., & Ozkan, B. (2005). An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 30, 145-155.
  79. Zangeneh, M., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2010). A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy, 35, 2927-2933. (In Persian)
مدیریت آب و آبیاری
دوره 13، شماره 3
مهر 1402
صفحه 715-733

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار