Introducing a simple method for calculating hydraulic parameters by Beerkan infiltration experiment

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Water and Soil, University of Zabol, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Water and Soil, University of Zabol, Iran

Abstract

The Beerkan single ring infiltration experiment is receiving more attention because of its simplicity and low expense in running in recent years. BESTslope algorithm is the original algorithm in Beerkan experiment, which estimates some soil hydraulic properties such as saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and sorptivity coefficient (S).The purpose of this research is to compare the performance of BESTslope algorithm with a simple proposed method and to determine the value of a constant parameter as the ratio of gravity force to capillary force (α) for loam and sandy loam soils. For this purpose, a number of 113 beerkan infiltration experiments were carried out in Sistan research field. The results showed that the estimated Ks values for 31 selected experiments, in which the relative fitting error (Er) for each test is less than 5.5% are similar to those obtained for 59 selected experiments having an average Er of less than 5.5%. However, these results were largely different from those obtained for 101 selected experiments having an average Er of less than 10%. Overall, the magnitude of α for loam and sandy loam soils of study area was determined as the average of two α values obtained for 31 and 59 selected experiments and it is equal to 0.013.

Keywords


  1. Bagarello V, Di Prima S, Iovino M and Provenzano G. (2014a) Estimating field-saturated soil hydraulic conductivity by a simplified Beerkan infiltration experiment. Hydrological Processess. 28: 1095–1103
  2. Bagarello V, Di Prima S and Iovino M. (2014b) Comparing alternative algorithms to analyze the Beerkan infiltration experiment. Soil Science Society of America. 78: 724–736.
  3.  Di Prima S, Lassabatere L, Bagarello V, Iovino M and Angulo-Jaramillo R (2016) testing a new automated single ring infiltrometer for Beerkan infiltration experiments. Geoderma 262: 20–34.
  4.  Elrick DE and Reynolds WD (1992) Methods for analyzing constant-head well permeameter data. Soil Science Society of America. 56: 320–323
  5.  Gardner WR (1958) Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Science. 85:228–232.
  6.  Gee GW and Or D (2002) 2.4 Particle-size analysis. In: Dane, J.H., Topp, G.C. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 4, Physical methods. : SSSA Book Series. 5. Soil Science Society of America.  Inc. Madison. WI. pp. 255–293.
  7.  Haverkamp R, Ross P, Smetten K and Parlange J. (1994) Three-dimensional analysis of infiltration from the disc infiltrometer: 2.Physically based infiltration equation. Water Resources Research. 30: 2931–2935.
  8.  Krause P, Boyle DP, and Base F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model. Advances in Geosciences. 5:89-97.
  9.  Lassabatere L, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Soria Ugalde, JM, Cuenca R, Braud I and Haverkamp R (2006) Beerkan estimation of soil transfer parameters through infiltration experiments. Soil Science Society of America.70: 521–532.
  10.   Mubarak I, Mailhol J, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Ruelle P, Boivin P and Khaledian M (2009) temporal variability in soil hydraulic properties under drip irrigation. Geoderma150:158–165.
  11.  Mubarak I, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Mailhol JC, Ruelle P, Khaledian M and Vauclin M (2010) Spatial analysis of soil surface hydraulic properties: is infiltration method dependent? Agricultural Water Management. 97: 1517–1526.
  12.  Reynolds WD and Elrick DE (1990) Ponded infiltration from a single ring: I. Analysis of steady flow. Soil Science Society of America. 54:1233–1241
  13.  Reynolds W and Elrick DE (2002) 3.4.1.1 Principles and parameter definitions. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods, Dane JH, Topp GC (eds). SSSA Book Series, No. 5. Science Society of America. Madison Wisconsin, USA: 797–801.
  14.  Vandervaere JP, Vauclin M and Elrick DE. (2000) Transient flow from tension infiltrometers: I. The two-parameter equation. Soil Science Society of America. 64: 1263–1272.
  15.   Wu L, Pan L, Mitchell J and Sanden B (1999) Measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity using a generalized solution for single-ring infiltrometers. Soil Science Society of America.63:788–792.
  16.  Xu X, Kiely G and Lewis G (2009) Estimation and analysis of soil hydraulic properties through infiltration experiments: comparison of BEST and DL fitting methods. Soil Use and Management. 25:354–361.
  17.  Xu X, Lewis C, Liu W, Albertson J and Kiely G (2012). Analysis of single-ring infiltrometer data for soil hydraulic properties estimation: Comparison of BEST and Wu methods. Agriculture Water Management. 107:34–41.
  18.  Yilmaz D, Lassabatere L, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Deneeleand D and Legret M (2010) Hydrodynamic characterization of basic oxygen furnace slag through an adapted BEST method. Vadose Zone. 9:107–116.