حکمرانی موثر منابع آب با تقویت مشارکت جمعی در سیستم اجتماعی–اکولوژیکی ( منطقه مورد مطالعه: حوضه آبریز قره‌سو)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

مهندسی محیط زیست-منابع آب، دانشکده محیط زیست، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

10.22059/jwim.2025.394738.1227

چکیده

با توجه به روند فزاینده و غیرقابل کنترل برداشت از منابع آب زیرزمینی، بازاندیشی در طراحی گزینه اقدامات موردنیاز برای مدیریت منابع آب با هدف بهره­‌مندی حداکثری از ظرفیت مشارکت جمعی بهره‌برداران ضروری است. این پژوهش با بهره­‌گیری از چارچوب سیستم‌های اجتماعی–اکولوژیکی و فرضیات حاکم بر خودسازماندهی بازیگران، در نبود رویکردهای تحلیلی پیش‌نگر و نظام‌مند، به تحلیل نحوه تأثیرگذاری مداخلات سیاستی بر ۱۰ متغیر مؤثر بر ظرفیت مشارکت جمعی کشاورزان در حوضه آبریز قره‌سو پرداخته است. بر این اساس، روابط علّی میان گزینه­‌های اجرایی سند سازگاری با کم­آبی با متغیرهای کلیدی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد که در دوره ۱۸ ساله موردبررسی، پایداری اجتماعی در غیاب مشارکت جمعی و عدم هم‌سویی هدف‌مند میان سیاست‌های بخش آب و کشاورزی، تهدیدی برای پایداری اکولوژیکی در منطقه است. در سیستم اجتماعی–اکولوژیکی درهم تنیده حوضه قره­سو، حل این چالش نیازمند تحلیل اثر تجمعی مداخلات بر متغیرهای سیاست‌پذیر شامل "دانش بهره‌برداران"، "قوانین منتخب جمعی" ، "رهبران محلی"،  "اعتماد کشاورزان" و "بهره‌وری سیستم" و متغیرهای زمینه‌ای شامل "اهمیت منبع برای کشاورز"، "تغییرپذیری آب زیرزمینی" و "تعداد خانوار کشاورزان" است. این پژوهش به شیوه­ای کاربردی امکان ارزیابی استقرار مدیریت مشارکتی آب در راستای اجرای بند "ت" ماده ۴۰ قانون برنامه پنج ساله هفتم پیشرفت را در حوضه­‌های آبریز فراهم می‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effective water governance through strengthening collective action in the social–ecological system (Case study: Qaresou River Basin)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghazal Jafari
  • Babak Omidvar
Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Given the increasing and uncontrolled depletion of groundwater resources, rethinking the design of necessary management measures to maximize the potential of collective action among users has become an inevitable necessity. This study, addressing the absence of foresight-based and systematic analytical approaches, utilizes the Social–Ecological Systems Framework and the assumptions underlying self-organization of users to analyze how policy interventions impact ten key variables influencing the capacity of farmers for collective action in the Qaresou Basin. To assess these effects, causal relationships between the policy interventions outlined in Iran’s national document on water scarcity adaptation and the key variables were examined. The findings indicate that during the 18-year study period, in the absence of collective action and purposeful alignment between water and agricultural policies, social sustainability consistently posed a threat to ecological sustainability. In the tightly interwoven social–ecological system of the Qaresou Basin, this requires an analysis of the cumulative impact of interventions on policy-responsive variables including “user knowledge”, “collective-choice rules”," “local leadership”, “institutional trust”, and “system productivity” and contextual variables such as “resource importance”, “groundwater mobility”, and “the number of farming households”. This study provides a practical basis for assessing the implementation of participatory water management, in accordance with clause “T”, article 40 of the law of the seventh five-year development plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Coastal aquifer
  • Social–Ecological Systems Framework
  • Water resource management
  • Causal loop diagrams
  1. Acheampong, E. N., Swilling, M., & Urama, K. (2016). Developing a framework for supporting the implementation of integrated water resource management (IWRM) with a decoupling strategy. Water Policy, 18(6), 1317-1333. doi:10.2166/wp.2016.155
  2. Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4).
  3. Bouchet, L., Thoms, M. C., & Parsons, M. (2019). Groundwater as a social-ecological system: A framework for managing groundwater in Pacific Small Island Developing States. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 8, 579-589. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.02.008
  4. Bouchet, L., Thoms, M. C., & Parsons, M. (2022). Using causal loop diagrams to conceptualize groundwater as a social-ecological system. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 836206.
  5. Cox, M. (2014). Applying a Social-Ecological System Framework to the Study of the Taos Valley Irrigation System. Human Ecology, 42(2), 311-324. doi:10.1007/s107-45-014-9651y
  6. Development, W. a. S. (2018). Special section: The need for the change in the country's water policies. Water and Sustainable Development, 4(2), 169-190. doi:10.22067/jwsd.v4i2.72223
  7. Doneo, A., & Conrad, E. (2024). Managing groundwater from the ground up: an ex ante assessment of the potential for collective action.
  8. Elsawah, S., Pierce, S. A., Hamilton, S. H., van Delden, H., Haase, D., Elmahdi, A., & Jakeman, A. J. (2017). An overview of the system dynamics process for integrated modelling of socio-ecological systems: Lessons on good modelling practice from five case studies. Environmental Modelling & Software, 93, 127-145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.001
  9. GhorbanzadehZafarani, G., Karbalaei, S., Al-Attar, W. M., Golshani, R., Tayefeh, F. H., & Ashrafizadeh, A. (2023). Baseline occurrence of organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides in water, sediment, and fish in the Miankaleh wetland, Iran. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 192, 115097.
  10. Gohari, A., Mirchi, A., & Madani, K. (2017). System dynamics evaluation of climate change adaptation strategies for water resources management in central Iran. Water Resources Management, 31, 1413-1434.
  11. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons: the population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. SCIENCE, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
  12. Herrera de Leon, H. J., & Kopainsky, B. (2019). Do you bend or break? system dynamics in resilience planning for food security. System Dynamics Review, 35(4), 287-309.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1643
  13. Herrera, H., Schütz, L., Paas, W., Reidsma, P., & Kopainsky, B. (2022). Understanding resilience of farming systems: Insights from system dynamics modelling for an arable farming system in the Netherlands. Ecological Modelling, 464, 109848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109848
  14. Hileman, J., Hicks, P., & Jones, R. (2016). An alternative framework for analysing and managing conflicts in integrated water resources management (IWRM): linking theory and practice. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(5), 675-691. doi:10.1080/07900627.2015.1076719
  15. Inam, A., Adamowski, J., Prasher, S., Halbe, J., Malard, J., & Albano, R. (2017). Coupling of a distributed stakeholder-built system dynamics socio-economic model with SAHYSMOD for sustainable soil salinity management– Part 1: Model development. Journal of Hydrology, 551, 596-618. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.039
  16. Madani, K., & Shafiee-Jood, M. (2020). Socio-hydrology: a new understanding to unite or a new science to divide. water, 12(7), 1941.
  17. Mazraeh, F., Amirnejad, H., & Nikooie, A. (2022). Application of integrated hydro-economic optimization model for water resources management of qarehsou river basin to wetland protection and food security. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 36(1), 17-35.
  18. McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2).
  19. Morçöl, G. (2014). Self-organization in collective action: Elinor Ostrom’s contributions and complexity theory. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1(2), 9-22.
  20. Naderi, L., Karamidehkordi, E., Badsar, M., & Moghadas, M. (2024). Impact of climate change on water crisis and conflicts: Farmers’ perceptions at the ZayandehRud Basin in Iran. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 54, 101878.
  21. Ojha, S. (2023). Study of Social-Ecological Systems and Climate-Related Disasters in the Indian Sundarbans. Applied Science and Biotechnology Journal for Advanced Research, 2(1), 8-13.
  22. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. SCIENCE, 325(5939), 419-422. doi:doi:10.1126/science.1172133
  23. Partelow, S. (2018). A review of the social-ecological systems framework. Ecology and Society, 23(4).
  24. Rova, S., & Pranovi, F. (2017). Analysis and management of multiple ecosystem services within a social-ecological context. Ecological Indicators, 72, 436-443.
  25. Sarami-Foroushani, T., Balali, H., Movahedi, R., & Partelow, S. (2024). Indicator assessment of groundwater resource sustainability: Using the framework of socio-ecological systems in Hamedan-Bahar Plain, Iran. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 54, 101889.
  26. Slootweg, R., & Jones, M. (2011). Resilience thinking improves SEA: a discussion paper. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(4), 263-276. doi:10.3152/146155111X12959673795886
  27. Tohidimoghadam, A., PourSaeed, A., Bijani, M., & Samani, R. E. (2023). Towards farmers’ livelihood resilience to climate change in Iran: A systematic review. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 19, 100266.
  28. Tsuyuguchi, B. B., Morgan, E. A., Rêgo, J. C., & Oliveira Galvão, C. d. (2020). Governance of alluvial aquifers and community participation: a social-ecological systems analysis of the Brazilian semi-arid region. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1539-1552.
  29. Van steenbergen, F. (2006). Promoting local management in groundwater. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(3), 380-391. doi:10.1007/s10040-005-0015-y