ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی اجرای شبکه آبیاری و زهکشی دشت ورامین با استفاده از ماتریس آیکولد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی آب، پردیس ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، پاکدشت، ایران.

2 گروه محیط زیست، پژوهشکده هیدرولیک و سازه های آبی، مؤسسه تحقیقات آب وزارت نیرو، تهران، ایران.

10.22059/jwim.2025.394257.1224

چکیده

توجه به محیط ­زیست باید در اولویت مجریان پروژه باشد. اثرات زیست‌محیطی یکی از ارکان کلیدی توسعه پایدار است. این مطالعه به بررسی ارزیابی زیست‌محیطی شبکه آبیاری و زه‌کشی ورامین در استان تهران می‌پردازد. برای دستیابی به هدف پژوهش، شناسایی و پیش‌بینی اثرات مثبت و منفی قابل‌توجه ناشی از اجرای پروژه با استفاده از ماتریس ICOLD انجام شد. ماتریس ارزیابی اثرات زیست‌محیطی برای گزینه اجرای شبکه زه‌کشی ورامین، به‌همراه جمع جبری اثرات آن، ارائه شده است. گزینه اجرا در سه مرحله ساخت، بهره‌برداری و اقدامات پس از کاهش اثرات ارزیابی شد. از کل اثرات، 88/32 درصد مربوط به محیط فیزیکی، 76/27 درصد مربوط به محیط طبیعی و 36/39 درصد مربوط به محیط اجتماعی-اقتصادی است. مهم‌ترین اثرات مثبت ناشی از اجرای شبکه زه‌کشی ورامین شامل ۱۴ اثر است. پس از اقدامات کاهش اثرات، دو اثر در محیط فیزیکی، دو اثر در محیط طبیعی و دو اثر در محیط اجتماعی-اقتصادی مشاهده می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Environmental Impact Assessment of the Implementation of the Varamin Plain Irrigation and Drainage Network Using the ICOLD Matrix

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Eslami 1
  • Maryam Varavi pour 1
  • Mahsa Jabbari 2
1 Department of Water Engineering, College of Aburayhan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Pakdasht, Iran.
2 Department of Environment, Hydraulics and Water Structures Research Institute, Water Research Institute, Ministry of Energy, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Environmental considerations should be a priority for project implementers. Environmental impacts are one of the key pillars of sustainable development. This study examines the environmental assessment of the irrigation and drainage network in Varamin, located in Tehran Province. To achieve the research objective, significant positive and negative impacts resulting from the project implementation were identified and predicted using the ICOLD matrix. The environmental impact assessment matrix for the implementation option of the Varamin drainage network, along with the cumulative effects, is presented. The implementation option was evaluated in three phases: construction, operation, and post-impact mitigation measures. Of all the impacts, 32.88% pertained to the physical environment, 27.76% to the natural environment, and 39.36% to the socio-economic environment. The most significant positive impacts resulting from the implementation of the Varamin drainage network include 14 effects. After mitigation measures were taken, 2 effects were observed in the physical environment, 2 effects in the natural environment, and 2 effects in the socio-economic environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental Impact Assessment
  • Irrigation and Drainage Network
  • ICOLD Matrix
  • Varamin

مراجع

  1. (2019). Technical report on Varamin irrigation and drainage network. Pakdasht Regional Water Irrigation Company, 22 pages. (In Persian)
  2. Ataei, P., Yagoubi Farani, A., & Iazidi, A. (2018). Evaluation of the Environmental Components of the Construction of Irrigation and Drainage Network in the Direction of Rural Development (Case Study: Irrigation and Drainage Network of Band Fayzabad Fars Province). Journal of Natural Environment, 70(1), 113-137. https://doi.org/10.22059/jne.2017.127878.953
  3. Dehnavi, A., & Kozegar, K. (2019). Equivalence of Modified IKOLD Results with the Aim of Using Decision-Making Principles of the Iranian Leopold Method in Water Resources Development Plans (Case Study of the Physical Environment of the Piaigchay Kalibar Dam). Environmental Science and Technology, 6(6), 1. (In Persian).
  4. Ghanian, M., Taqipour, M., Abdeshahi, A., & Forouzani, M. (2023). Environmental Impact Assessment of Land reclamation Project in Khuzestan Province; case of study Miyanab irrigation and drainage network. Journal of Geography and Planning, 27(84), 95-109.
  5. Gilbuena Jr, R., Kawamura, A., Medina, R., Amaguchi, H., Nakagawa, N., & Du Bui, D. (2013). Environmental impact assessment of structural flood mitigation measures by a rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) technique: A case study in Metro Manila, Philippines. Science of the Total Environment, 456, 137-147.
  6. Karlson, M., Mörtberg, U., & Balfors, B. (2014). Road ecology in environmental impact assessment. Environmental impact assessment review, 48, 10-19.
  7. Khodaie, A., & Zandi, R. (2024). Evaluation of the environmental effects of the irrigation and drainage network of the main channel of Khoda Afarin city (East Azarbaijan Province). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 13(2), 140-161. doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2024.86908.1467. (In Persian).
  8. Mousavi, S.H., Sheikh Goudarzi, M., & Kaviani, A. (2012). A Comparison of Modified Leopold
    Matrix and ICOLD Matrix in the Environmental Impact Assessment of Koor (Nahang)
    Dam in the Sistan and Baluchistan Province. Journal of Environmental Management
    and Planning    , 2(4), 15-25. https://www.magiran.com/p1147937. (In Persian).
  9. Nikravan, M., Azizi, M., Payami, M., Sadeghi, M., Zarrati, A. R., Amini, A., ... & Schleiss, A. (2018). Improvement of EIA methods for large reservoirs by using network thinking analysis approach: a case study of Azad dam, Iran. Proceedings of HYDRO 2018, 1(17.02).
  10. Samarakoon, M., & Rowan, J. S. (2008). A critical review of environmental impact statements in Sri Lanka with particular reference to ecological impact assessment. Environmental Management, 41, 441-460.
  11. Sarbazi, M., & Akbari, M. (2019). Evaluation of the Environmental Effects of Dam Construction
    Using the ICOLD Method. Case study: Golbo Dam, the 4th International Congress of
    Agricultural Development, Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism of Iran.
    https://www.iraneiap.ir/article_106935.html
  12. Seyed Javad, M. S., & Mashal, M. (2014). Evaluation of hydraulic sensitivity indices of non-peak structures (case study of irrigation and drainage network of Varamin plain). Water and Irrigation Management, 4(2), 229-242. doi: 10.22059/jwim.2014.53038. (In Persian).
  13. Snell, T., & Cowell, R. (2006). Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(4), 359-376.
  14. (2011). Issues Brief #1, The Environmental Dimension of IFSD. Division of Environmental Law and Conventions (DELC).
  15. Valivand, F., & Katibeh, H. (2019). Quantitative long-term impact assessment of current management and exploitation conditions on the Varamin Plain aquifer. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Research, 26(2), 251-261. doi: 10.22069/jwsc.2019.15448.3067. (In Persian).
  16. Zarea, S., & Hayati, D. (2015). Environmental, social and economic effects of the development of modern irrigation and drainage networks in Karbal plain and its determining factors from the perspective of users. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 29(3), 379-395. (In Persian).
  17. Zoratipour, E., Hooshmand, A., & Cheraghi, M. (2022). Environmental Impact Assessment of Irrigation and Drainage Network Using the Conventional and Modified ICOLD Matrix Methods. Environment and Water Engineering, 8(2), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.22034/jewe.2021.299672.1611. (In Persian).
مدیریت آب و آبیاری
دوره 15، شماره 4
اسفند 1404
صفحه 877-888

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار