مدیریت آب و آبیاری

مدیریت آب و آبیاری

ارزیابی اثرات تغییر کاربری اراضی با پایش تبخیر- تعرق واقعی در دوره های آتی(مطالعه موردی دشت ورامین)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده فناوری کشاورزی (ابوریحان)، دانشگاه تهران، ایران.
10.22059/jwim.2026.418148.1320
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش، ارزیابی اثرات تغییر کاربری اراضی، با پایش تبخیر-تعرق واقعی، در دوره‌های آتی دشت ورامین، می‌باشد. تبخیر-تعرق، با چهار الگوریتم تک‌منبعی سنجش از دور: تعادل انرژی سطحی زمین (SEBAL)، نقشه‌برداری تبخیر-تعرق در وضوح بالا با کالیبراسیون داخلی (METRIC)، سیستم تعادل انرژی سطحی (SEBS)، تراز انرژی سطحی ساده‌شده (SSEB) و تصاویر سنجنده MODIS، از ماه می تا آگوست سال‌های 2009-2007، بررسی شد. اثر تغییر کاربری اراضی تصاویر Landsat سال‌های 1999، 2009 و 2019 با الگوریتم حداکثر احتمال و ضریب کاپا، به‌ترتیب 807/0، 837/0 و 801/0 و دقت 12/87، 49/90 و 99/88 درصد، به کاربری پهنه‌های آب، پوشش گیاهی، صخره، مناطق ساخته‌شده، اراضی بایر و اراضی کشاورزی، طبقه‌بندی و با مدل‌ساز تغییر سرزمین (LCM) و مدل تلفیقی اتوماتای سلولی-زنجیره مارکوف (CA-Markov)، نقشه کاربری اراضی سال‌های 2030 و 2059، شبیه‌سازی، گردید. نتایج نشان داد، کاربری اراضی کشاورزی، از مساحت 8/44 هزارهکتار در سال ۱۹۹۹ به 3/39 هزارهکتار در سال ۲۰۰۹ و به 6/38 هزارهکتار در سال ۲۰۱۹، کاهش یافت. وسعت کاربری مناطق شهری، روستایی و صنعتی در سال ۱۹۹۹، مقدار 57/6 درصد از کل منطقه بوده است، اما در سال ۲۰۱۹ به 48/18 درصد افزایش یافت. کاربری پوشش گیاهی مرتعی از مقدار 9/14 هزارهکتار در سال ۱۹۹۹ به 6/11 هزارهکتار در سال ۲۰۰۹ و به 4/6 هزارهکتار در سال ۲۰۱۹، کاهش یافت. براساس نتایج داده‌ها، برای تغییر کاربری اراضی و تبخیر-تعرق واقعی دوره‌های آتی، روند افزایشی، پیش‌بینی می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Assessment of the Impacts of Land-Use Change through Monitoring Actual Evapotranspiration in Future Periods (Case Study: Varamin Plain)

نویسندگان English

Behzad Azadegan
Zashra Moslemi
Ali Reza Massah Bavani
Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology (Aburihan), University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of land-use change by monitoring actual evapotranspiration in future periods in the Varamin Plain. Evapotranspiration was investigated from May to August during 2007–2009 using four single-source remote-sensing algorithms: the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration (METRIC), the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS), and the Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEB), together with MODIS sensor imagery. To evaluate the effects of land-use change, Landsat images from 1999, 2009, and 2019 were classified using the maximum likelihood algorithm. The corresponding Kappa coefficients were 0.807, 0.837, and 0.801, respectively, with classification accuracies of 87.12%, 90.49%, and 99.88%. The land-use classes included water bodies, vegetation cover, rocky areas, built-up areas, barren lands, and agricultural lands. Using the Land Change Modeler (LCM) and the integrated Cellular Automata–Markov Chain (CA–Markov) model, land-use maps for 2030 and 2059 were simulated. The results showed a declining trend in agricultural land area, from 44.8 thousand hectares in 1999 to 39.3 thousand hectares in 2009 and 38.6 thousand hectares in 2019. Urban, rural, and industrial areas exhibited an increasing trend: these land uses covered 6.57% of the total study area in 1999, increasing to 18.48% by 2019. Rangeland vegetations cover also declined, from 14.9 thousand hectares in 1999 to 11.6 thousand hectares in 2009 and 6.4 thousand hectares in 2019. Based on the data results, an increasing trend is predicted for land use change and actual evapotranspiration in future periods.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Actual evapotranspiration
Algorithm
Land-use change
Remote sensing
  1. Abdollahi, A. A., Khabazi, M., & Dorani, Z. (2020). Modeling and Predicting Land Use Changes in Lahijan City With a sustainable development approach. Journal of sustainable City, 2(4), 17-30.
  2. Ahmadzadeh, H., Fakheri Fard, A., Ghorbani, M. A., & Tajrishy, M. (2022). Evaluation of the Simultaneous Effect of Changes of Climatic Variables and Land Use on the Actual Evapotranspiration Trend Using the SWAT Model in the Ajichi Basin. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 26 (3), 15-34. (In Persian).
  3. Afzal, M. & Ragab, R. (2020). Assessment of the potential impacts of climate change on hydrology at catchment scale: modelling approach including prediction of future drought events using drought indices. Applied Water Science, 10(10), 1-19. Doi: 0.1007/s13201-020-01293-1.
  4. Aghaei, M., Khavarian, H., & Mostafazadeh, R. (2020). Prediction of Land Use Changes Using the CA-Markov and LCM Models in the Kozehtopraghi, Watershed in the Province of Ardabil. Watershed Management Research Journal, 33(3), 91-107. (In Persian).
  5. Awotwi, A., Yeboah, F., & Kumi, M. (2015). Assessing the impact of land cover changes on water balance components of White Volta Basin in West Africa. Water and Environment Journal, 29(2), 259-267.
  6. Banjara M., Bhusal A., Ghimire A. B., & Kalra, A. (2024). Impact of land use and land cover change on hydrological processes in urban watersheds: analysis and forecasting for flood risk management. Geosciences, 14, 40. doi: 10.3390/geosciences14020040
  7. Barideh, R., & Nasimi, F. (2022). Investigating the changes in agricultural land use and actual evapotranspiration of the Urmia Lake basin based on FAO’s WaPOR database. Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, 264(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107509
  8. Berihun, M.L., Tsunekawa, A., Haregeweyn, N., Meshesha, D.T., Adgo, E., Tsubo, M., Masunaga, T., Fenta, A.A., Sultan, D., Yibeltal, M., & Ebabu, K. (2019). Hydrological responses to land use/land cover change and climate variability in contrasting agro-ecological environments of the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Science of the Total Environment, 689, 347-365.
  9. Chessman, B.C., & Townsend, S.A. (2010). Differing effects of catchment land use on water chemistry explain contrasting behaviour of a diatom index in tropical northern and temperate southern Australia, Ecological Indicators, 10, 620-626.
  10. Chen, Z., Nong, X., Zang, C., Ou, W. & Qiu, L. (2024). Evolution of evapotranspiration in the context of land cover/climate change in the Han River catchment of China. Hydrological Processes, 38(8). doi: 10.1002/hyp.15265
  11. Christou, A., Dalias, P., & Neocleous, D. (2017). Spatial and temporal variations in evapotranspiration and net water requirements of typical Mediterranean crops on the island of Cyprus. The Journal of Agricultural Science; 155(8), 1311-1323.
  12. Doost, Z. H. & Yaseen, Z. M. (2025). The impact of land use and land cover on groundwater fluctuations using geographical remote sensing and information systems: Representative case study in Afghanistan. Environment, Development Sustainability, 27(4), 9515-9538. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-04253-2 
  13. Fakhar, M.S., & Kaviani, A. (2024). Estimation of actual evapotranspiration using remote sensing data for improved water management. J. of water and irrigation management, 14(3), 629-648. doi: 10.22059/jwim.2024.369438.1123. (In Persian).
  14. Fu, W., Tang, B., Member, S., Ma, X., Zhu, X., Li, Y. & Cheng, L. (2025). Assessing Terrain Effect on Evapotranspiration Using the SEBAL Model in Mountainous Regions. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 18, 60176040. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3539822
  15. Gessesse, B., Bewket, W., & Bräuning, A. (2015). Model‐based characterization and monitoring of runoff and soil erosion in response to land use/land cover changes in the Modjo watershed, Ethiopia. Land degradation & development; 26(7), 711-724.
  16. Ghaffari, G. Ghodousi, J., & Ahmadi, H. (2010). Investigating the hydrological effects of land use change in catchment (Case study: Zanjanrood Basin). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, Volume 16, 1(1), 163-180. (In Persian).
  17. Han, J., Hayashi, Y., Cao, X., & Imura, H. (2009). Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: A case study of Shanghai, China Landscape and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.002
  18. Kizilkaya, R., & Dengi, O. (2010). Variation of land use and land cover effects on soil some physico-chemical characteristics and soil enzyme activity. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 97(2), 15-24.
  19. Khoshnood, S., Lotfata, A., Mombeni, M., Daneshi, A., Verrelst, J., & Ghorbani, K. (2023). A spatial and temporal correlation between remotely sensing evapotranspiration with land use and land cover. Water, 15(6), 1068; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061068. 
  20. Kuma, H.G., Feyessa, F.F., & Demissie, T.A. (2021). Hydrologic responses to climate and land-use/land-cover changes in the Bilate catchment, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Water and Climate Change; 12(8), 3750-3769.
  21. Kundu, S., Mondal, A., Khare, D., Hain, C., & Lakshmi, V. (2018). Projecting climate and land use change impacts on actual evapotranspiration for the Narmada river basin in central India in the future. Remote Sensing, 10(4), 578.
  22. Lazaro, V.Z., Osni J.P., Marcilene D.F., & Janaina, B.P. (2009). Environmental degradation related to mining, urbanization and pollutant sources: Poc os de Caldas, Brazil. J. Bull Eng Geol Environ, 68, 317-329.
  23. Liu, M., & Hu, D. (2019). Response of wetland evapotranspiration to land use/cover change and climate change in Liaohe River Delta, China. Water, 11(5), 955.
  24. Li, M., Chu, R., Islam, A.R.M.T., & Shen, S. (2021). Characteristics of surface evapotranspiration and its response to climate and land use and land cover in the Huai River Basin of eastern China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 683-699.
  25. Lu, Z., Li, C., Zhang, J., Lei, G., Yu, Z. & Dong, Z. (2024). Impact of land use change on actual evapotranspiration in the Songnen Plain, China. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, Volume 54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.101854 
  26. Jahanshahi, A., Martijn, J. B., Sopan, D. P., & Hoshin, G. (2025). Impact of land use land cover change on catchment hydrological response in 576 Iranian catchments. Journal of Arid Environments, 231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.105463
  27. Jahangir, M.H., & Arast, M. (2020). Remote sensing products for predicting actual evapotranspiration and water stress footprints under different lands cover. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121818.
  28. Mahmoud, S.H., Gan, T.Y., & Zhu, D.Z. (2023). Impacts of climate change and climate variability on water resources and drought in an arid region and possible resiliency and adaptation measures against climate warming. Climate Dynamics, 61, 4079-4105.
  29. Montesinos, C., Saavedra, D., Bourrel, L., Rau, P., Diaz, R. D., & Lavado-Casimiro, W. (2026). Understanding the Impacts of Climate Change and Landcover/Land Use Transformations on Highlands Hydrological Ecosystem Services in the Piuray–Ccorimarca Watershed (Andean Cordillera of Peru). Climate, 14(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli14020049
  30. Moutrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, Volume 66, pp. 274-259.
  31. Murray, S.J., Foster, P.N., & Prentice, I.C. (2012). Future global water resources with respect to climate change and water withdrawals as estimated by a dynamic global vegetation model. Journal of Hydrology, 448, 14-29.
  32. Pavanelli, D., & Capra, A. (2014). Climate change and human impacts on hydroclimatic variability in the Reno River catchment, Northern Italy. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water, 42(5), 535-545.
  33. Puttinaovarat, S., Khaimook, K. & Horkaew, P. (2025). Land use and land cover classification from satellite images based on ensemble machine learning and crowdsourced data verification. International Journal of Cartography, 11(1), 3-23.doi: 10.1080/23729333.2023.2166252.
  34. Solaimani, K., & Azmoudeh, A. (2011). Investigation of Land Use Change Effects on some Physical and Chemical Properties, as well as the soil Erodibility. Physical Geography Research, 42(4), 111-123. (In Persian).
  35. Tena, T.M., Mwaanga, P., & Nguvulu, A. (2019). Impact of land use/land cover change on hydrological components in Chongwe River Catchment. Sustainability, 11(22), 6415.