<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Water and Irrigation Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-6298</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluating Remote Sensing Technique and Machine Learning Algorithms in Estimating Sugarcane Evapotranspiration</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluating Remote Sensing Technique and Machine Learning Algorithms in Estimating Sugarcane Evapotranspiration</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>965</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>982</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">94257</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jwim.2023.362473.1090</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alavi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0007-1613-9575</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Albaji</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-5483-5834</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mona</FirstName>
					<LastName>Golabi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-9199-2628</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abd Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Naseri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-5833-5802</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saeid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Homayouni</LastName>
<Affiliation>Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS), 490 Couronne St, Quebec, QC G1K 9A9, Canada.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-0214-5356</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Estimating crop evapotranspiration (ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;) in arid and semi-arid areas can be difficult due to the dynamic nature of this process across both time and space. In addition, obtaining on-site measurements for this variable can be very time-consuming and costly. This study aimed to develop a framework that accurately estimates the sugarcane crop evapotranspiration on a spatio-temporal scale. This was achieved using four machine learning (ML) algorithms (MLR, CART, SVR, and GBRT) combined with remote sensing (RS) data and meteorological variables. Also, to reduce the dependence on several meteorological parameters in conventional ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt; equations, the performance of eight different experimental temperature-based methods and four modified Hargreaves &amp; Samani equations was evaluated compared to the standard FAO-Penman-Monteith method. For this purpose, weather data were collected from Hakim Farabi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial meteorological station for three years (2018-2021). Nine combinations of input variables (RS data and meteorological variables) were designed based on the IGR method and then evaluated by the ML algorithms. The results showed that the highest accuracy of ML algorithms based on R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, RMSE, and MAE statistics was obtained in CART (0.99, 0.41, and 0.18) and GBRT algorithms (0.99, 0.65, and 0.26), respectively. Regarding temperature-based methods, Ivanov’s equation had the best performance with an R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; of 0.91, while Baier and Robertson’s equation had the weakest performance with an R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; of 0.78 when estimating ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;. Overall, the combination of RS and ML algorithms effectively produced more precise and reliable ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt; values on both temporal and spatial scales.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Estimating crop evapotranspiration (ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;) in arid and semi-arid areas can be difficult due to the dynamic nature of this process across both time and space. In addition, obtaining on-site measurements for this variable can be very time-consuming and costly. This study aimed to develop a framework that accurately estimates the sugarcane crop evapotranspiration on a spatio-temporal scale. This was achieved using four machine learning (ML) algorithms (MLR, CART, SVR, and GBRT) combined with remote sensing (RS) data and meteorological variables. Also, to reduce the dependence on several meteorological parameters in conventional ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt; equations, the performance of eight different experimental temperature-based methods and four modified Hargreaves &amp; Samani equations was evaluated compared to the standard FAO-Penman-Monteith method. For this purpose, weather data were collected from Hakim Farabi Sugarcane Agro-Industrial meteorological station for three years (2018-2021). Nine combinations of input variables (RS data and meteorological variables) were designed based on the IGR method and then evaluated by the ML algorithms. The results showed that the highest accuracy of ML algorithms based on R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, RMSE, and MAE statistics was obtained in CART (0.99, 0.41, and 0.18) and GBRT algorithms (0.99, 0.65, and 0.26), respectively. Regarding temperature-based methods, Ivanov’s equation had the best performance with an R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; of 0.91, while Baier and Robertson’s equation had the weakest performance with an R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; of 0.78 when estimating ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;. Overall, the combination of RS and ML algorithms effectively produced more precise and reliable ET&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt; values on both temporal and spatial scales.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Decision Tree</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">experimental models</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Gradient boosted regression tree</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">spectral indices</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Support vector machine</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jwim.ut.ac.ir/article_94257_4eb142cc779f80936fe91bc9a2ea28f3.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
